Skip to content
Sublime EdgePragmatic Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Business Central consulting led from the finance outcome backwards

Business Central rewards organizations that decide how they want to operate before they configure. The role of the consultant is to force those decisions early and to hold the design to them.

Functional depth

Where the expertise sits

Twenty-two years across Microsoft ERP means the functional questions have been asked before, in most industries, at most scales.

  • Finance

    Chart of accounts and dimension design, intercompany and consolidation, fixed assets, cash management, and a close cycle that can be run by the team rather than by a specialist.

  • Supply chain

    Purchasing, inventory valuation, warehouse configuration, landed cost and replenishment tuned to real demand patterns rather than default parameters.

  • Manufacturing

    Routings, BOM structures, capacity and standard versus actual cost, including reconciliation with shop-floor and MES data.

  • Power Platform

    Power BI reporting on Business Central data, Power Automate for approval and exception flows, and Power Apps for capture at the edge of the process.

  • AL collaboration

    Working with AL developers as the functional authority: extension scope, upgrade-safe design, and a firm boundary between configuration and code.

  • Assessment and optimization

    Independent review of a live environment: customization debt, licensing position, performance, and the specific changes that would shorten the close.

Implementation methodology

How implementations are run

The method is deliberately conventional. Programmes fail on discipline, not on novelty.

  1. 01

    Operating model definition

    Before configuration begins, the financial and operational model is agreed with leadership: legal entity structure, dimensional reporting, approval authority and the definition of a completed transaction.

  2. 02

    Conference room pilot

    The business runs its own transactions through a configured system, using its own data. Gaps surface here, where they are inexpensive, rather than in user acceptance testing.

  3. 03

    Controlled extension scope

    Every proposed extension is tested against process change first. What survives is specified functionally and built upgrade-safe by AL developers.

  4. 04

    Cutover and stabilization

    A rehearsed cutover with a defined rollback position, followed by a supported first close where the consultant is present rather than on call.

Migration methodology

GP to Business Central migration

A migration is a chance to retire two decades of accumulated workaround. Treated as a lift-and-shift, it carries all of it forward.

  1. 01

    History strategy first

    Decide what history moves, what stays queryable in an archive, and what is retired. This decision drives migration effort more than any other and is frequently deferred until it is expensive.

  2. 02

    Sequence by legal entity

    Entity-led sequencing keeps each close intact throughout the programme. Module-led sequencing optimizes for the implementation team and puts the close at risk.

  3. 03

    Rebuild, do not replicate

    GP customizations frequently encode a process workaround. Each one is examined against native Business Central capability before it is recreated.

  4. 04

    Parallel close and sign-off

    At least one parallel close before decommissioning GP, reconciled line by line, signed off by finance rather than by the project team.

Evaluating Business Central

Whether the question is a first implementation, a migration from Dynamics GP, or an environment that is live but underperforming, the first step is an honest assessment.